4.6 Review

How I manage myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassifiable: Practical approaches for 2022 and beyond

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 197, Issue 4, Pages 407-416

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18087

Keywords

best practice; MPN; MPN unclassifiable; pregnancy; treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MPN-U represents a rare, poorly defined, and heterogeneous group of MPNs, likely accounting for around 5% of all MPNs. Diagnosing MPN-U poses challenges due to lack of agreed monitoring and therapeutic guidelines, validated prognostic markers, and licensed therapies. There is also uncertainty regarding the risk of aggressive clinical course, when to treat, and the use of primary thromboprophylaxis.
Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-unclassifiable (MPN-U) or not otherwise specified represents a rare, poorly defined and heterogeneous group of MPNs. Disease incidence is difficult to define but likely represents close to 5% of all MPNs when strict World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria are applied. Dynamic review over time is required to assess if the disease can be re-classified into another MPN entity. A diagnosis of MPN-U leads to many challenges for both the patient and physician alike including lack of agreed monitoring and therapeutic guidelines, validated prognostic markers and licenced therapies coupled with exclusion from clinical trials. MPN-U has an inherent risk of an aggressive clinical course and transformation in some but who, and when to treat in the chronic phase, including identifying who may require more aggressive therapy at an earlier stage, remains elusive. Moreover, despite the significant thrombotic risk, there is no agreement on systematic primary thromboprophylaxis. We hereby provide a contemporary overview of MPN-U in addition to four illustrative cases providing our collective suggested approaches to clinical challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available