4.4 Article

Non-speculum sampling approaches for cervical screening in older women: randomised controlled trial

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 72, Issue 714, Pages E26-E33

Publisher

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0350

Keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; early detection of cancer; general practice; human papillomavirus DNA tests; older women; self-sampling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated whether offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling increases the cervical cancer screening uptake in women aged 50-64 who do not regularly attend screenings. The study found that offering these two options significantly increases the screening uptake and there are differences in screening modality preference among women of different ethnic backgrounds.
Background Cervical cancer proportionately affects women >= 65 years, espeually those not screened regularly. Speculum use is a key barrier Aim To assess if offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling increases uptake for lapsed attenders aged 50-64 years. Design and setting Pragmatic randomised control trial conducted at 10 general practices in East London, UK. Method Participants were 784 women aged 50-64 years, last screened 6-15 years before randomisation. Intervention participants received a letter offering the choice of non-speculum clinician- or self-sampling. Control participants received usual care. The main outcome measure was uptake within 4 months. Results Screening uptake 4 months after randomisation was significantly higher in the intervention arm: 20.4% (n = 80/393) versus 4.9% in the control arm In - 19/391, absolute difference 15.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.0% to 20.0%, P<0.0011. This was maintained at 12 months: intervention 30.5% In = 120/393) versus control 13.6% (n = 53/391) (absolute difference 17.0%, 95% CI = 11.3% to 22.7%, P<0.0011. Conventional screening attendance within 12 months was very similar for both intervention 12.7% (n = 50/393) and control 13.6% (n = 53/391) arms. Ethnic differences were seen in screening modality preference. More White women opted for self-sampling (50.7%, n = 38/75), whereas most Asian and Black women and those from other ethnic backgrounds opted for conventional screening. Conclusion Offering non-speculum clinician-taken sampling and self-sampling substantially increases uptake in older lapsed attendee women. Non-speculum clinician sampling appeals to women who dislike the speculum but still prefer a clinician to take their sample. Providing a choice of screening modality may be important for optimising cervical screening uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available