4.4 Article

Identifying how GPs spend their time and the obstacles they face: a mixed-methods study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 72, Issue 715, Pages E148-E160

Publisher

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0357

Keywords

ethnography; general practice; mixed methods; operational failures; time and motion studies; operations research

Funding

  1. Academy of Medical Sciences Starter Grant for Clinical Lecturers [SGL018_1023]
  2. The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), University of Cambridge
  3. Health Foundation
  4. Academy of Medical SciencesStarter Grant for Clinical Lecturers
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Lectureship
  6. Health Education East of England Academic Clinical Fellowship
  7. NIHR Senior Investigator award [NF-SI-0617-10026]
  8. THIS Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although problems that impair task completion, known as operational failures, have been little studied, this research quantified the time GPs spend on different activities during clinical sessions and identified the nature and impact of operational failures. The study showed that operational failures disrupt patient care, impair experiences of work, and impose burden in an already pressurised system, highlighting the need for coordinated action to support GPs.
Background Although problems that impair task completion - known as operational failures - are an important focus of concern in primary aim, they have remained little studied. Aim To quantify the time GPs spend on different activities during clinical sessions; to identify the number of operational failures they encounter; and to characterise the nature of operational failures and their impact for GPs. Design and setting Mixed method triangulation study with 61 GPs in 28 NHS general practices in England from December 2018 to December 2019. Method Time-motion methods, ethnographic observations, and interviews were used. Results Time-motion data on 7679 GP tasks during 238 hours of practice in 61 clinical sessions suggested that operational failures were responsible for around 5.0%(95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5% to 5.4%) of all tasks undertaken by GPs and accounted for 3.9% (95% CI = 3.2% to 4.5%) of clinical time. However, qualitative data showed that time motion methods, which depend on pre-programmed categories, substantially underestimated operational failures. Qualitative data also enabled further characterisation of operational failures, extending beyond those measured directly in the time-motion data (for example, interruptions, deficits in equipment/supplies, and technology) to include problems linked to GPs' coordination role and weaknesses in work systems and processes. The impacts of operational failures were highly consequential for GPs' experiences of work Conclusion GPs experience frequent operational failures, disrupting patient care, impairing experiences of work, and imposing burden in an already pressurised system. This better understanding of the nature and impact of operational failures allows for identification of targets for improvement and indicates the need for coordinated action to support GPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available