4.2 Article

Objective Response to First-Line Treatment as a Predictor of Overall Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Centers over a 25-Year Period

Journal

BREAST CARE
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 264-271

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000519729

Keywords

Chemotherapy; Metastatic breast cancer; Objective response; Survival; Treatment line

Funding

  1. Stockholm Region [K 2017-4577]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the efficacy of subsequent treatment lines for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the association between radiologic objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Results showed limited efficacy in late treatment lines for MBC, while response to first-line therapy was associated with long-term survival.
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to study the efficacy of subsequent treatment lines for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), as well as the association between radiologic objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Methods: In this retrospective study, consecutive patients treated for MBC in two centers in Greece from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 2016, were identified and clinicopathologic data regarding tumor characteristics and administered treatments were collected. The efficacy per treatment line in terms of ORR, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS, as well as the prognostic value of ORR at first line were investigated. Results: A total of 977 patients with MBC were identified; 950 received any treatment. At first line, ORR was 43.5%, PFS 11.4 months (95% CI 10.4-12.4), and median OS 52.4 months (95% CI 47.7-57.1). Lower ORR and shorter PFS were observed with each subsequent line. Median OS was significantly longer for patients that had an objective response at first line, 61.9 months (95% CI 51.1-69.7) for responders versus 41.3 months (95% CI 44.1-63.3) for nonresponders (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, failure to achieve an objective response was an independent predictor of poor survival (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.34-2.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Late treatment lines for MBC seem to have limited efficacy, while response to first-line therapy is associated with long-term survival. The latter should be considered in the treatment strategy of patients with MBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available