4.5 Article

Time trends in mental health indicators during the initial 16 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark

Journal

BMC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03655-8

Keywords

COVID-19; Mental health; Mental illness; Anxiety; Loneliness; Worries; Quality of life; Prospective; Longitudinal; Time-series; Trend

Categories

Funding

  1. VELUX FOUNDATIONS' special pool for data-collection projects related to studying COVID-19 [36336]
  2. Landsforeningen AEldre Sagen (DaneAge)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdowns have had negative effects on mental health. Mental health was worse during strict lockdown periods and improved during reopening phases. Women, young individuals, and those with mental and/or chronic illnesses had poorer mental health compared to others. Individuals with pre-existing mental illnesses had less variability in mental health over time. The largest differences between gender and age groups were observed during the second lockdown.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated national lockdowns have been linked to deteriorations in mental health worldwide. A number of studies analysed changes in mental health indicators during the pandemic; however, these studies generally had a small number of timepoints, and focused on the initial months of the pandemic. Furthermore, most studies followed-up the same individuals, resulting in significant loss to follow-up and biased estimates of mental health and its change. Here we report on time trends in key mental health indicators amongst Danish adults over the course of the pandemic (March 2020 - July 2021) focusing on subgroups defined by gender, age, and self-reported previously diagnosed chronic and/or mental illness. Methods We used time-series data collected by Epinion (N=8,261) with 43 timepoints between 20 March 2020 and 22 July 2021. Using a repeated cross-sectional study design, independent sets of individuals were asked to respond to the Copenhagen Corona-Related Mental Health questionnaire at each timepoint, and data was weighted to population proportions. The six mental health indicators examined were loneliness, anxiety, social isolation, quality of life, COVID-19-related worries, and the mental health scale. Gender, age, and the presence of previously diagnosed mental and/or chronic illness were used to stratify the population into subgroups for comparisons. Results Poorer mental health were observed during the strictest phases of the lockdowns, whereas better outcomes occurred during reopening phases. Women, young individuals (<34 yrs), and those with a mental- and/or chronic illness demonstrated poorer mean time-series than others. Those with a pre-existing mental illness further had a less reactive mental health time-series. The greatest differences between women/men and younger/older age groups were observed during the second lockdown. Conclusions People with mental illness have reported disadvantageous but stable levels of mental health indicators during the pandemic thus far, and they seem to be less affected by the factors that result in fluctuating time-series in other subgroups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available