4.5 Article

Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 22, Issue SUPPL 2, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05007-3

Keywords

Hip fractures; Femoral neck fracture; Femoral fractures' classification; Reliability

Funding

  1. Orthopedic and Traumatology School of Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore -Roma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the reliability of the 2018 AO/OTA classification, simplified AO/OTA classification, and Garden classification in femoral neck fractures. The results showed that the interobserver reliability of the Garden classification was low, while the AO and simplified AO/OTA classifications had only fair reliability. The experience of the observers did not seem to improve reliability. No classification was shown to be superior in terms of reliability.
Background Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most common injury in the elderly. A valid radiographic classification system is mandatory to perform the correct treatment and to allow surgeons to facilitate communication. This study aims to evaluate reliability of 2018 AO/OTA Classification, AO/OTA simplified and Garden classification. Methods Six Orthopaedic surgeons, divided in three groups based on trauma experience, evaluated 150 blinded antero-posterior and latero-lateral radiography of FNF using Garden classification, 2018 AO/OTA and simplified AO/OTA classification. One month later, the radiographs were renumbered and then each observer performed a second evaluation of the radiographs. The Kappa statistical analysis was used to determine the reliability of the classifications. Cohen's Kappa was calculated to determine intra and inter observer reliability. Fleiss' Kappa was used to determine multi-rater agreement. Results The k values of interobserver reliability for Garden classification was from 0,28 to 0,73 with an average of 0,49. AO classification showed reliability from 0,2 to 0,42, with average of 0,30. Simplified AO/OTA classification showed a reliability from 0,38 to 0,58 with an average of 0,48. The values of intra observer reliability for Garden classification was from 0,48 to 0,79 with an average of 0,63. AO classification showed reliability from 0,2 to 0,64 with an average of 0,5. Simplified AO/OTA classification showed a reliability from 0,4 to 0,75 with an average of 0,61. Conclusion The revised 2018 AO/OTA classification simplified the previous classification of intracapsular fracture but remain unreliable with only fair interobserver reliability. The simplified AO/OTA classification show a reliability similar to Garden classification, with a moderate interobserver reliability. The experience of the surgeons seems not to improve reliability. No classification has been shown to be superior in terms of reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available