4.8 Article

The impact of blood transcriptomic biomarker targeted tuberculosis preventive therapy in people living with HIV: a mathematical modelling study

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02127-w

Keywords

Tuberculosis; HIV; Preventive therapy; Biomarker; Modelling

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) [OPP1151915]
  2. Wellcome Trust [204928/Z/16/Z]
  3. Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [D43 TW010559]
  4. Harry Crossley Clinical Research Fellowship
  5. South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) through its Division of Research Capacity Development under the SAMRC Clinician Researcher Programme
  6. Wellcome Trust [204928/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1151915] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using annual RISK11 screening with preventive therapy for positive cases may prevent 26% more cases over 10 years among PLHIV compared to universal treatment. The cost of the RISK11 test should be no more than 10% of preventive therapy costs, with the greatest benefit potentially seen in PLHIV on ART.
Background Tuberculosis (TB) preventive therapy is recommended for all people living with HIV (PLHIV). Despite the elevated risk of TB amongst PLHIV, most of those eligible for preventive therapy would never develop TB. Tests which can identify individuals at greatest risk of disease would allow more efficient targeting of preventive therapy. Methods We used mathematical modelling to estimate the potential impact of using a blood transcriptomic biomarker (RISK11) to target preventive therapy amongst PLHIV. We compared universal treatment to RISK11 targeted treatment and explored the effect of repeat screening of the population with RISK11. Results Annual RISK11 screening, with preventive therapy provided to those testing positive, could avert 26% (95% CI 13-34) more cases over 10 years compared to one round of universal treatment. For the cost per case averted to be lower than universal treatment, the maximum cost of the RISK11 test was approximately 10% of the cost of preventive therapy. The benefit of RISK11 screening may be greatest amongst PLHIV on ART (compared to ART naive individuals) due to the increased specificity of the test in this group. Conclusions Biomarker targeted preventive therapy may be more effective than universal treatment amongst PLHIV in high incidence settings but would require repeat screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available