4.7 Article

FDCA: A Full-Duplex Collision Avoidance MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 4638-4647

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2547461

Keywords

Concurrent transmission; full-duplex; MAC; propagation delay; underwater acoustic networks

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61173132, 61303245, 61274033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unlike terrestrial radio frequency communication, acoustic waves are major communication means in underwater networks. Unfortunately, acoustic waves incur long propagation delays that must be considered in the media access control (MAC) design to achieve a high throughput. Another major reason for low throughput is that almost all the acoustic modems operate under half-duplex mode. For increasing communication throughput, several full-duplex acoustic modems are proposed. However, most current MAC protocols are designed for half-duplex modems that are not suited for full-duplex modems. Toward a proper approach, this paper models and analyzes the impact of full-duplex modem characteristics on the Aloha protocol. We propose a full-duplex collision avoidance (FDCA) MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks. It is a hand-shaking based protocol that designed for full-duplex modems to maximize network throughput. Collision avoidance schedule algorithm avoids the collisions at both the receiver and the sender by passively acquired local information (neighboring nodes' propagation delay and expected transmission schedules). Moreover, to cope with the channel's long propagation delay, it launches multiple simultaneous handshaking processes with neighbors to concurrently propagate multiple packets in the underwater channel. Our extensive simulation results have confirmed that the FDCA protocol outperforms the existing full-duplex MAC protocols in representative long propagation delay scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available