4.5 Article

A machine learning-based system for detecting leishmaniasis in microscopic images

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07029-7

Keywords

Leishmania; Cutaneous leishmaniasis; Artificial intelligence; Image processing; Adaboost; Viola-Jones; Algorithm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for the automatic diagnosis of leishmaniasis. The results showed that the system achieved a certain level of accuracy in detecting macrophages infected with the leishmania parasite and amastigotes outside of macrophages.
Background Leishmaniasis, a disease caused by a protozoan, causes numerous deaths in humans each year. After malaria, leishmaniasis is known to be the deadliest parasitic disease globally. Direct visual detection of leishmania parasite through microscopy is the frequent method for diagnosis of this disease. However, this method is time-consuming and subject to errors. This study was aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for automatic diagnosis of leishmaniasis. Methods We used the Viola-Jones algorithm to develop a leishmania parasite detection system. The algorithm includes three procedures: feature extraction, integral image creation, and classification. Haar-like features are used as features. An integral image was used to represent an abstract of the image that significantly speeds up the algorithm. The adaBoost technique was used to select the discriminate features and to train the classifier. Results A 65% recall and 50% precision was concluded in the detection of macrophages infected with the leishmania parasite. Also, these numbers were 52% and 71%, respectively, related to amastigotes outside of macrophages. Conclusion The developed system is accurate, fast, easy to use, and cost-effective. Therefore, artificial intelligence might be used as an alternative for the current leishmanial diagnosis methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available