4.5 Article

Design of a new lyoprotectant increasing freeze-dried Lactobacillus strain survival to long-term storage

Journal

BMC BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12896-021-00726-2

Keywords

Lactiplantibacillus; Long-term storage; Water activity; Bound water; Lyoprotectant; Freeze-drying; Micellar casein

Funding

  1. University of Burgundy
  2. company Indigo Therapeutics
  3. National Agency for Research ANRT (CIFRE) [2016/0787]
  4. Indigo Therapeutics
  5. ANRT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to achieve low water activity after freeze-drying and during long-term storage through the design of a lyoprotectant. Results showed that the addition of whey and inulin did not effectively increase bacterial survival, while the addition of micellar casein to sucrose significantly improved the protective effect of the lyoprotectant. Comparing to other lyoprotectants, micellar casein resulted in a lower water activity after freeze-drying and during storage, indicating its potential in stabilizing dried bacteria for long-term storage.
Background Stabilization of freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria during long-term storage is challenging for the food industry. Water activity of the lyophilizates is clearly related to the water availability and maintaining a low a(w) during storage allows to increase bacteria viability. The aim of this study was to achieve a low water activity after freeze-drying and subsequently during long-term storage through the design of a lyoprotectant. Indeed, for the same water content as sucrose (commonly used lyoprotectant), water activity is lower for some components such as whey, micellar casein or inulin. We hypothesized that the addition of these components in a lyoprotectant, with a higher bound water content than sucrose would improve lactobacilli strains survival to long-term storage. Therefore, in this study, 5% whey (w/v), 5% micellar casein (w/v) or 5% inulin (w/v) were added to a 5% sucrose solution (w/v) and compared with a lyoprotectant only composed of 5% sucrose (w/v). Protective effect of the four lyoprotectants was assessed measuring Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CNCM I-4459 survival and water activity after freeze-drying and during 9 months storage at 25 degrees C. Results The addition whey and inulin were not effective in increasing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CNCM I-4459 survival to long-term-storage (4 log reduction at 9 months storage). However, the addition of micellar casein to sucrose increased drastically the protective effect of the lyoprotectant (3.6 log i.e. 0.4 log reduction at 9 months storage). Comparing to a lyoprotectant containing whey or inulin, a lyoprotectant containing micellar casein resulted in a lower water activity after freeze-drying and its maintenance during storage (0.13 +/- 0.05). Conclusions The addition of micellar casein to a sucrose solution, contrary to the addition of whey and inulin, resulted in a higher bacterial viability to long-term storage. Indeed, for the same water content as the others lyoprotectants, a significant lower water activity was obtained with micellar casein during storage. Probably due to high bound water content of micellar casein, less water could be available for chemical degradation reactions, responsible for bacterial damages during long-term storage. Therefore, the addition of this component to a sucrose solution could be an effective strategy for dried bacteria stabilization during long-term storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available