4.6 Article

Development of a prognostic signature of patients with esophagus adenocarcinoma by using immune-related genes

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-021-04456-2

Keywords

Esophagus adenocarcinoma (EAC); Immune-related genes (IRGs); Prognostic signature; TCGA database; Cox regression analysis

Funding

  1. scientific and technological research and application of thoracoscopy in lung disease surgery [2017BA046]
  2. Application and promotion of thoracoscopy in chest diseases [CGZH201703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study constructed a prediction signature with 12 IRGs related to EAC, showing that the high-risk group had significantly shorter survival rates compared to the low-risk group. Multivariate Cox analysis and Nomogram demonstrated that the combined analysis of risk score, Sex, M stage, and Stage accurately predicted the 1- and 3-year survival rates of patients.
Background Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. The immune-related genes (IRGs) are crucial to immunocytes tumor infiltration. This study aimed to construct a IRG-related prediction signature in EAC. Methods The related data of EAC patients and IRGs were obtained from the TCGA and ImmPort database, respectively. The cox regression analysis constructed the prediction signature and explored the transcription factors regulatory network through the Cistrome database. TIMER database and CIBERSORT analytical tool were utilized to explore the immunocytes infiltration analysis. Results The prediction signature with 12 IRGs (ADRM1, CXCL1, SEMG1, CCL26, CCL24, AREG, IL23A, UCN2, FGFR4, IL17RB, TNFRSF11A, and TNFRSF21) was constructed. Overall survival (OS) curves indicate that the survival rate of the high-risk group is significantly shorter than the low-risk group (P = 7.26e-07), and the AUC of 1-, 3- and 5- year survival prediction rates is 0.871, 0.924, and 0.961, respectively. Compared with traditional features, the ROC curve of the risk score in the EAC patients (0.967) is significant than T (0.57), N (0.738), M (0.568), and Stage (0.768). Moreover, multivariate Cox analysis and Nomogram of risk score are indicated that the 1-year and 3-year survival rates of patients are accurate by the combined analysis of the risk score, Sex, M stage, and Stage (The AUC of 1- and 3-years are 0.911, and 0.853). Conclusion The 12 prognosis-related IRGs might be promising therapeutic targets for EAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available