4.0 Article

Renal nerve stimulation: complete versus incomplete renal sympathetic denervation

Journal

BLOOD PRESSURE
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 376-385

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1982376

Keywords

Renal sympathetic denervation; renal nerve stimulation; hypertension; autonomic nervous system; procedural endpoint

Funding

  1. Abbott Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using renal nerve stimulation (RNS) during renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) can enhance the antihypertensive effect, leading to significant and sustained reduction in 24-hour blood pressure with fewer antihypertensive drugs at follow-up. RNS-induced blood pressure changes were correlated with 24-hour blood pressure changes at follow-up, and patients with complete denervation had significantly lower blood pressure compared to those with incomplete denervation.
Purpose: Blood pressure (BP) reduction after renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is highly variable. Renal nerve stimulation (RNS) can localize sympathetic nerves. The RNS trial aimed to investigate the medium-term BP-lowering effects of the use of RNS during RDN, and explore if RNS can check the completeness of the denervation. Material and methods: Forty-four treatment-resistant hypertensive patients were included in the prospective, single-center RNS trial. The primary study endpoint was change in 24-h BP at 6- to 12-month follow-up after RDN. The secondary study endpoints were the acute procedural RNS-induced BP response before and after RDN; number of antihypertensive drugs at follow-up; and the correlation between the RNS-induced BP increase before versus after RDN (delta [Delta] RNS-induced BP). Results: Before RDN, the RNS-induced systolic BP rise was 43(+/- 21) mmHg, and decreased to 9(+/- 12) mmHg after RDN (p < 0.001). Mean 24-h systolic/diastolic BP decreased from 147(+/- 12)/82(+/- 11) mmHg at baseline to 135(+/- 11)/76(+/- 10) mmHg (p < 0.001/<0.001) at follow-up (10 [6-12] months), with 1 antihypertensive drug less compared to baseline. The Delta RNS-induced BP and the 24-h BP decrease at follow-up were correlated for systolic (R = 0.44, p = 0.004) and diastolic (R = 0.48, p = 0.003) BP. Patients with <= 0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response after RDN had a significant lower mean 24-h systolic BP at follow-up compared to the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (126 +/- 4 mmHg versus 135 +/- 10 mmHg, p = 0.04). 83% of the patients with <= 0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response had normal 24-h BP at follow-up, compared to 33% in the patients with >0 mmHg residual RNS-induced BP response (p = 0.023). Conclusion: The use of RNS during RDN leads to clinically significant and sustained lowering of 24-h BP with fewer antihypertensive drugs at follow-up. RNS-induced BP changes were correlated with 24-h BP changes at follow-up. Moreover, patients with complete denervation had significant lower BP compared to the patients with incomplete denervation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available