4.8 Article

A critical comparison of natural enzymes and nanozymes in biosensing and bioassays

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113494

Keywords

Nanozymes; Natural enzymes; Biosensing; Bioassay

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LQ1601]
  2. ERDF Multidisciplinary research to increase application potential of nanomaterials in agricultural practice [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanozymes are nanomaterials that mimic enzyme-like catalytic activity and have the potential to replace natural enzymes in biosensing and bioassays, eliminating their inherent limitations. The catalytic activity of nanozymes can be modulated through appropriate synthesis strategies.
Nanozymes (NZs) are nanomaterials that mimic enzyme-like catalytic activity. They have attracted substantial attention due to their inherent physicochemical properties for use as promising alternatives to natural enzymes (NEs) in a variety of research fields. Particularly, in biosensing and bioassays, NZs have opened a new horizon to eliminate the intrinsic limitations of NEs, including their denaturation at extreme pH values and temperatures, poor reusability and recyclability, and high production costs. Moreover, the catalytic activity of NZs can be modulated in the preparation step by following an appropriate synthesis strategy. This review aims to gain insight into the potential substitution of NEs by NZs in biosensing and bioassays while considering both the pros and cons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available