4.8 Article

Quantitative paper-based dot blot assay for spike protein detection using fuchsine dye-loaded polymersomes

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113484

Keywords

Paper-based colorimetric assay; Biosensor; Dye-loaded polymersome; Biofunctionalization; SARS-CoV-2

Funding

  1. Research Foundation of Ege University, Turkey [TOA-2020-21862]
  2. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Development [2010K120810/2020K12150700, 2016K121190]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel protein detection platform utilizes advanced technology with higher sensitivity, faster turnaround, and better stability compared to traditional nanoparticle methods. Smartphone-assisted sensing technology enables the tool to be used at home, reducing the burden on healthcare facilities.
Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays are the gold standard for virus diagnosis. Point-of-care (POC) technologies have shown great progress during this period. Herein, we propose a novel fuchsine dye-loaded polymersome for a colorimetric paper-based dot blot spike protein diagnostic assay for COVID-19 via smartphone-assisted sensing. The prepared platform aimed to create an adaptable tool that competes with traditional nanoparticle-based assays employing gold and silver. Analytical characterization and application of the testing platform showed high sensitivity (10 times better than gold nanoparticles), stability, fast turnaround, and reproducibility. The potential and possibilities demonstrated by the current platform could be observed in its adaptability for different markers and pathologies. In addition, smartphone-assisted sensing emphasizes the ability to use the tool at home by common peoples which can lower the burden on the healthcare facilities and reach more underdeveloped regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available