4.5 Article

Impacts of Forest Cover on Surface Runoff Quality in Small Catchments

Journal

BIORESOURCES
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 7829-7844

Publisher

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI
DOI: 10.15376/biores.16.4.7830-7845

Keywords

Water quality; Forestry; Agriculture; Forest ecosystem services

Funding

  1. Scientific Grand Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic
  2. Slovak Academy of Science
  3. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-18-0347, APVV-19-0612, APVV15-0715]
  4. [VEGA 1/0665/20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found differences in surface runoff between forest and non-forest catchments, which were mainly attributed to changes in agricultural land management rather than the influence of forest cover.
Forest cover influences not only the amount of surface runoff, but also its quality. The concentrations of chemicals in surface runoff differ between forest catchments and non-forest catchments (agricultural areas). The authors investigated the chemical compositions of surface runoff in two small neighboring catchments (forest, non-forest), by analyzing and summarizing data over a period of 26 years from 1986 to 2012. During this period, the stock and absorption area of forest stands increased, air quality improved, the agricultural landscape was partly regenerated, and global climate change became apparent. The authors observed differences in surface runoff between forest- and non-forest catchments. However, these differences were not mainly caused by the influence of the forest cover, but by changes in agricultural land management. Since 2006, agricultural land has been managed without the use of artificial fertilizers, which reduced the contents of pollutants in surface runoff from the non-forest catchment. The existence of the forest as such excludes or noticeably eliminates the use of fertilizers and chemical substances that affect water quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available