4.8 Article

Factors governing microalgae harvesting efficiency by flocculation using cationic polymers

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 340, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125669

Keywords

Algal extracellular polymeric substances; Chlorella vulgaris; Growth phase; Phosphorous; Zeta potential

Funding

  1. University of Technology Sydney

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the harvesting efficiency of Chlorella vulgaris by flocculation is influenced by the growth phase of the microalgae, with changes in microalgal cell properties playing a key role in this process. The presence of high levels of microalgal extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and negatively charged cells at the stationary phase contribute to effective flocculation via charge neutralisation and bridging.
This study aims to elucidate the mechanisms governing the harvesting efficiency of Chlorella vulgaris by flocculation using a cationic polymer. Flocculation efficiency increased as microalgae culture matured (i.e. 35-45, 75, and > 97% efficiency at early, late exponential, and stationary phase, respectively. Unlike the negative impact of phosphate on flocculation in traditional wastewater treatment; here, phosphorous residue did not influence the flocculation efficiency of C. vulgaris. The observed dependency of flocculation efficiency on growth phase was driven by changes in microalgal cell properties. Microalgal extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in both bound and free forms at stationary phase were two and three times higher than those at late and early exponential phase, respectively. Microalgae cells also became more negatively charged as they matured. Negatively charged and high EPS content together with the addition of high molecular weight and positively charged polymer could facilitate effective flocculation via charge neutralisation and bridging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available