4.8 Article

Techno-economic feasibility assessment of bacterial cellulose biofilm production during the Kombucha fermentation process

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 346, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126659

Keywords

Biofilm; Kombucha; Process simulation; Techno-economics; Sensitivity analysis

Funding

  1. Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC), Department of Biotechnology, by the Government of India [BIRAC/KIIT0471/BIG-13/18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of a 60-ton annual capacity Kombucha-based cellulose production facility, revealing that the process is feasible but lacks information for large-scale manufacturing. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing fermentation units and automating the process can reduce input costs.
Bacterial cellulose produced during Kombucha fermentation has recently received lots of attention owing to its desirable mechanical and physicochemical properties and is exploited for different food, textiles and environmental applications. However, lack of information on process feasibility often hinders large-scale manufacturing of Kombucha-based cellulose. Therefore, the current study assesses techno-economic feasibility of a 60-ton annual capacity Kombucha-based cellulose production facility using SuperPro designer. Economic feasibility analysis showed an estimation of 13.72 million US$ as total investment and 3.8 million US$ as operating costs with 89% expenses associated with facility dependent and labour costs. The process feasibility is revealed with a payback time of 4.23 years, 23.64% return on investment and 16.48% internal rate of return. Sensitivity analysis presented that increased volume of fermentation units and automating the process can significantly reduce input costs. Such research is necessary to aid policymakers in facilitating the commercialization of Kombucha-based cellulose at field scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available