4.8 Article

Microbial recovery of critical metals from secondary sources

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126208

Keywords

Bioleaching; Biosorption; Metal recovery; Microbial biomass; Secondary sources

Funding

  1. Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CCCDI-UEFISCDI within PNCDI III [PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-5239, 555, 269PED/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on the use of microbes in recovering critical metals from secondary sources is still in the early stages and requires further efficiency improvements. Future developments in microbial processes for critical metal recovery should focus on utilizing novel microorganisms and high-performance strategies.
The continuous development of technologies involving critical metals, both in Europe and over the world, and geopolitical challenges in areas rich in critical metal sources, imposed increased research efforts to recover them from secondary sources, by eco-efficient processes. Yet, microbes-metal interactions are not sufficiently exploited to recover metals from secondary sources, although they are already used in ore extraction. This review examines and compare strategies and processes involving microorganisms for critical metals recovery, since conventional physico-chemical methods are energy-intensive and often polluting. Two groups of microbial assisted recovery processes are discussed: metal mobilization from metal bearing waste, and selective metal separation from leaching solutions by immobilization on microbial biomass. Because most of the identified microbial technologies are developed on laboratory scale, the increase of biorecovery efficiency is compulsory for enhancing scaling-up potential. Future developments focused on novel microorganisms and high-performance strategies for critical metal recovery by microbial processes are considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available