4.8 Article

Novel strategy for microalgae cell disruption and wet lipid extraction by employing electro-Fenton process with sacrificial steel anode

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 343, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126110

Keywords

Microalgae biodiesel; Cell disruption; Electro-Fenton process; Sacrificial steel anode; Wet lipid extraction

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Sri Lanka [16-129]
  2. Senate Research Committee of University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka [SRC/TP/2017/01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Electro-Fenton process was studied as a potential cell disruption technique for recovery of lipids from wet biomass of the microalga Chlorella homosphaera. A maximum lipid yield of 19.99 +/- 1.33% was achieved at 40 min reaction time and 4.38 g/L biomass concentration. Biodiesel synthesized from lipids obtained via EFP conformed to the ASTM D6751-12 standard.
Electro-Fenton process (EFP) was studied as a potential cell disruption technique for recovery of lipids from wet biomass of the microalga Chlorella homosphaera. A novel approach of electrochemical dissolution of a sacrificial steel anode was used to provide Fe2+ required to initiate EFP and microalgae cell disruption. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize the process parameters and maximize the lipid yield of EFP. The RSM model (R-2 = 90.66%, Adj.R-2 = 87.71%) showed that a maximum lipid yield of 18.29% could be obtained at 40 min reaction time and 4.38 g/L biomass concentration. Experimental validation resulted in a lipid yield of 19.99 +/- 1.33%, which was significantly higher than wet lipid extraction without cell disruption. However, the lipid yield of EFP should be further improved to achieve comparable results to mechanical cell disruption methods. Nonetheless, biodiesel synthesized from lipids obtained via EFP conformed to the ASTM D6751-12 standard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available