4.8 Article

Biodegradation of bioplastics under aerobic and anaerobic aqueous conditions: Kinetics, carbon fate and particle size effect

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126265

Keywords

Aerobic biodegradation; Biodegradation tests; Bioplastics; Circular economy; End-of-life management; Organic recycling

Funding

  1. Societe des Produits Nestle S.A
  2. Regional Government of Castilla y Leon
  3. EU-FEDER programme [CLU 2017-09, UIC 315]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the biodegradation of various bioplastics in different aerobic and anaerobic conditions, showing that particle size significantly affects the degradation rate. The increase in biomass accounted for a varying proportion of the total carbon, highlighting the importance of analyzing biodegradation kinetics and carbon fate in improving the development and testing of biodegradable materials.
The biodegradation of PHB, PHBV, PBS, PBAT, PCL, PLA, and a PLA-PCL blend was compared under aerobic and anaerobic aqueous conditions assessing biodegradation kinetics, extent, carbon fate and particle size influence (in the range of 100-1000 mu m). Under standard test conditions, PHB and PBHV were biodegraded anaerobically (83.9 +/- 1.3% and 81.2 +/- 1.7%, respectively) in 77 days or aerobically (83.0 +/- 1.6% and 87.4 +/- 7.5%) in 117 days, while PCL was only biodegraded (77.6 +/- 2.4%) aerobically in 177 days. Apparent biomass growth accounted for 10 to 30.5% of the total initial carbon depending on the bioplastic and condition. Maximum aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation rates were improved up to 331 and 405%, respectively, at the lowest particle size tested (100-250 mu m). This study highlights the usefulness of analysing biodegradation kinetics and carbon fate to improve both the development and testing of biodegradable materials, and waste treatments in the context of a circular bioeconomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available