4.8 Article

Effects of low- and high-temperature thermal-alkaline pretreatments on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 337, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125400

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Energy efficiency; High-temperature thermal-alkaline pretreat-ment; Low-temperature thermal-alkaline pretreat-ment; Waste activated sludge

Funding

  1. Joint Research Project for the Yangtze River Conservation (Phase I), China [2019LHYJ01]
  2. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Province [2019JZZY020301]
  3. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences) [19Z02ESPCR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of low- and high-temperature thermal-alkaline pretreatments on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge were compared in laboratory experiments. Both pretreatments increased methane yield and sludge reduction, with high-temperature pretreatment showing a lower energy efficiency compared to low-temperature pretreatment.
To compare the effects of low- and high-temperature thermal-alkaline pretreatments (LTTAP, 60 +/- 1 degrees C, pH 12.0 +/- 0.1, 30 min and HTTAP, 160 +/- 1 degrees C, pH 12.0 +/- 0.1, 30 min, respectively) on anaerobic digestion (AD) of waste activated sludge, long-term and semi-continuous experiments were conducted in three laboratory continuous stirred tank reactors. The experimental results showed that the two pretreatments increased the methane yield of sludge from 89.20 +/- 2.41 mL/g added volatile solids (VS) to 117.50 +/- 5.27 mL/g added VS (LTTAP) and 156.40 +/- 2.99 mL/g added VS (HTTAP). After AD, the reduction of sludge (volatile solid) increased from 32.91 +/- 0.27% to 44.17 +/- 1.53% (LTTAP), and 50.86 +/- 1.18% (HTTAP), and the abundance of pathogenic bacteria decreased from 6.53% to 0.38% (LTTAP) and 0.14% (HTTAP). LTTAP enhanced both hydrogentrophic and acetoclastic methanogenis and HTTAP only enhanced acetoclastic methanogenis. Additionally, the energy efficiency of HTTAP and its subsequent AD was lower than that of LTTAP and its subsequent AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available