4.8 Article

Effects of different lignocellulosic wastes on alleviating acidification of L-lactic acid production from food waste fermentation

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 342, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126043

Keywords

Lactic acid; Food waste; Lignocellulosic wastes; Spent mushroom substance; Acidification alleviation

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFC1906302, 2019YFC1906304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978047, 5217100753]
  3. National Environmental and Energy Base for International Science & Technology Cooperation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that spent mushroom substance (SMS) could efficiently remove lignin through NaOH pretreatment, showing the best performance in the co-fermentation of food waste. Reusing 50% of pretreated liquid (PL) from SMS pretreatment resulted in higher lactid acid concentration and optical purity, with reduced NaOH consumption.
In this study, the effects of different lignocellulosic wastes on alleviating acidification in the fermentation of lactic acid (LA) from food waste (FW) were studied. Amongst three lignocellulosic wastes, spent mushroom substance (SMS) could reach 95.22% lignin removal efficiency through simple NaOH pretreatment. Results showed pretreated SMS was best choice for FW co-fermentation, the maximum LA concentration could reach 46.12 g/L. And the NaOH solution as neutraliser could save 5.69 mL compared with the other two lignocellulosic wastes. The reason for alleviating acidification was 4.71% calcium salt in SMS and the porous structure of SMS. Then, 50% of pretreated liquid (PL) produced in SMS pretreatment was reused in the co-fermentation process. Compared with the group with 0% PL loading, that with 50% PL loading showed an increase in LA concentration and optical purity of L-LA, reaching 50.95 g/L and 96.28%, and NaOH consumption also further decreased by 24.65%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available