4.8 Review

Bacterial biofilm and extracellular polymeric substances in the moving bed biofilm reactor for wastewater treatment: A review

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 345, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126476

Keywords

Wastewater; Bioreactors; MBBR; Biofilm; EPS; Carrier material

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [BT/PR17390/BCE/8/1158/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR) are widely used in wastewater treatment due to their low operational costs, technical feasibility, and stability. They are capable of achieving high removal rates of nitrogen, organic carbon, and ammonium nitrogen, and modifications in the surface properties of the biocarrier materials can further improve removal efficiency.
Among the several biofilm-based bioreactors, moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR) have been extensively used for wastewater treatment due to low operational costs, technical feasibility, and stability. Biofilm forming strains, e.g., Stenotrophomonas maltophila DQ01, achieved 94.21% simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) and 94.43% removal of total nitrogen (TN) at a cycle time of 7 h, and a biofilm consortium consisting of Chryseobacterium sp. and Rhodobacter sp. achieved 86.8% removal of total organic carbon (TOC) at hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 24 h using lab-scale MBBR. Modifications in the surface properties of the biocarrier materials achieved 99.5 +/- 1.1% chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 93.6 +/- 2.3% NH4+-N removal, significantly higher than the conventional commercial carrier. This review article summarizes the application of MBBR technology for wastewater treatment. The importance of bacterial biofilm and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), anammox-n-DAMO coupled processes, and carrier surface modifications in MBBR technology have also been discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available