4.7 Article

Virtual screening and in vitro validation of natural compound inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

Journal

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105574

Keywords

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Molecular modeling; Virus neutralization assay; Natural compound inhibitor

Funding

  1. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for new antivirals. Using virtual screening, this study identified compounds with antiviral activity against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This validates virtual screening as a tool for discovering potential antivirals.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to a major public health burden and has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide. As effective treatments are limited, there is a significant requirement for high-throughput, low resource methods for the discovery of novel antivirals. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein plays a key role in viral entry and has been identified as a therapeutic target. Using the available spike crystal structure, we performed a virtual screen with a library of 527 209 natural compounds against the receptor binding domain of this protein. Top hits from this screen were subjected to a second, more comprehensive molecular docking experiment and filtered for favourable ADMET properties. The in vitro activity of 10 highly ranked compounds was assessed using a virus neutralisation assay designed to facilitate viral entry in a physiologically relevant manner via the plasma membrane route. Subsequently, four compounds ZINC02111387, ZINC02122196, SN00074072 and ZINC04090608 were identified to possess antiviral activity in the mu M range. These findings validate the virtual screening method as a tool for identifying novel antivirals and provide a basis for future drug development against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available