4.7 Article

Design, synthesis and bioevaluation of 2,7-diaryl-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines as tubulin polymerization inhibitors

Journal

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105220

Keywords

Tubulin; Restriction configuration; Pyrazolo[1, 5-a]pyrimidine; Colchicine-binding site

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673293]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M641715]
  3. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1802072, XLYC2007073]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning [2020-MS-190]
  5. Shenyang Science & Technology Bureau Item [20-205-4-026]
  6. Shenyang Science and Technology Innovation Talents Program [RC200441]
  7. Plan for Development of Young Scholars of Shenyang pharmaceutical university [ZQN2018002]
  8. Program for Innovative Research Team of the Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The newly designed compound 6d showed significant antiproliferative activity against MCF-7 cancer cells, inhibiting cancer cell growth and migration through multiple pathways.
Two series of 2,7-diaryl-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines as tubulin polymerization inhibitors were designed to restrict bioactive configuration of (E,Z)-vinylogous CA-4. All of the target compounds were synthesized and then evaluated for their in vitro antiproliferative activities against three cancer cell lines (MCF-7, SGC-7901 and A549). Among them, 6d exhibited the most potent antiproliferative activity against the MCF-7 with IC50 value of 0.047 mu M. Moreover, 6d significantly inhibited tubulin polymerization, disrupted microtubule networks, arrested cell cycle at G2/M phase, induced apoptosis and hindered cancer cell migration. Colchicine competition assay and molecular docking studies suggested that 6d could interact with tubulin by binding to the colchicine site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available