4.6 Article

Lesion attentive thoracic disease diagnosis with large decision margin loss

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103202

Keywords

Thoracic disease diagnosis; Conventional deep models; Chest X-ray; Attention mechanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study proposes an improved deep model with two novel components, the lesion attentive network and the large decision margin loss, aiming to address the obstacles in chest X-ray image analysis. The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art thorax disease diagnosis performances on the validation and test set, demonstrating its superiority in accuracy and efficiency.
The automatic analysis of chest X-rays has been widely explored to develop a thoracic disease diagnosis system. Two obstacles affect the performance of conventional deep models. First, the position and size of lung lobes in different X-ray images vary significantly, making lesions different in appearance. Second, X-ray images sometimes contain irrelevant objects such as supporting devices, which contain much interference information, making it difficult to diagnose thoracic diseases accurately. To this end, an improved conventional deep model is aimed in this paper by proposing two novel components, the lesion attentive network, and the large decision margin loss. The proposed lesion attentive network imitates how a radiologist would analyze an image, focusing only on the most disease-related regions of the input images, which improves the efficiency of the model for feature extraction. The proposed large decision margin loss, in turn, encourages the model to excavate more accurate supporting evidence for predictions, increasing its generalization ability. Extensive experiments are conducted on the NIH Chest X-ray dataset. The proposed approach achieves the state-of-the-art thorax disease diagnosis performances on the validation and test set, demonstrating its superiority.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available