4.7 Article

Potent Time-Dependent Ice Recrystallization Inhibition Activity of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Sucrose Solutions

Journal

BIOMACROMOLECULES
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 497-504

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01201

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, AFRI Project [1022162]
  2. Hatch Project [1016040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) exhibit ice recrystallization inhibition (IRI) activity over longer exposure times in a model ice cream system. The time-dependent surface coverage of CNCs on ice crystals appears to be a key mechanism for inhibiting ice crystal growth. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting a suitable exposure time to evaluate IRI activity of new materials involving CNCs.
Exploring novel materials with ice recrystallization inhibition (IRI) activity in several fields often starts with a quantitative analysis of ice crystal size change by a splat assay or sandwich assay on a short time scale from 0.5 to 1 h. This study found that this time scale was insufficient to evaluate the IRI activity of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) in a model ice cream system-25.0% sucrose solution. No IRI activity was observed in CNCs incubated with ice crystals on a short time scale of 0.5-2.0 h. However, over longer time scales, the growth of ice crystals was entirely inhibited by 1.0% CNCs (between 2 and 24 h) and 0.5% CNCs (between 24 and 72 h) with corresponding final crystal sizes of 25 and 40 mu m, respectively. Additionally, ice shaping was observed on a long exposure time, but not on a short exposure time. The findings presented here can be explained by a time-dependent surface coverage of CNCs on ice crystals. The data here indicate the importance of choosing a suitable exposure time for evaluating the IRI activity of new materials and prompt a better understanding of IRI mechanisms involving CNCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available