4.5 Article

Intracellular Iron Binding and Antioxidant Activity of Phytochelators

Journal

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
Volume 200, Issue 8, Pages 3910-3918

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-021-02965-y

Keywords

Iron; Overload; Phytochelators; Tropolone; Transferrin

Funding

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2018/19684-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the key properties of five candidate phytochelators for iron overload diseases and found that tropolone and mimosine showed good binding capacity for iron, as well as antioxidant activity. They were also cell permeant and able to access labile pools of iron. These results suggest the potential of these molecules, especially mimosine, as adjuvants in treatments for iron overload.
Phytochelators have been studied as templates for designing new drugs for chelation therapy. This work evaluated key chemical and biological properties of five candidate phytochelators for iron overload diseases: maltol, mimosine, morin, tropolone, and esculetin. Intra- and extracellular iron affinity and antioxidant activity, as well as the ability to scavenge iron from holo-transferrin, were studied in physiologically relevant settings. Tropolone and mimosine (and, to a lesser extent, maltol) presented good binding capacity for iron, removing it from calcein, a high-affinity fluorescent probe. Tropolone and mimosine arrested iron-mediated oxidation of ascorbate with the same efficiency as the standard iron chelator DFO. Also, both were cell permeant and able to access labile pools of iron in HeLa and HepG2 cells. Mimosine was an effective antioxidant in cells stressed by iron and peroxide, being as efficient as the cell-permeant iron chelator deferiprone. These results reinforce the potential of those molecules, especially mimosine, as adjuvants in treatments for iron overload.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available