Cetacean conservation and the ethics of captivity

Recent decades have seen increasing opposition to cetacean captivity among the general public. However, these discussions often do not address captivity in the context of conservation. At the same time, approaches within conservation biology-compassionate conservation and multispecies justice-call for greater attention to the impact of conservation interventions on individual nonhuman animals. Many questions remain about the implications of these approaches for conservation practice. In this paper, we focus on two recent case studies in cetacean conservation. These case studies highlight how some forms of captivity can contribute to conservation and can help clarify what is at stake between advocates of these approaches and their critics. We argue that some forms of captivity can be ethically justified as part of an ex situ conservation effort, even in cases where they involve risk to individual cetaceans.

Automated summary

In recent decades, there has been a growing opposition to cetacean captivity among the general public, but discussions often overlook the relationship between captivity and conservation. Approaches in conservation biology such as compassionate conservation and multispecies justice call for more attention to the impact of conservation interventions on individual nonhuman animals. Some forms of captivity may be ethically justified as part of in situ conservation efforts, even if they involve risks to individual cetaceans.