4.7 Article

An overview in the development of cathode materials for the improvement in power generation of microbial fuel cells

Journal

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107834

Keywords

Cathode; Microbial fuel cells; Electricity generation

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [buctrc201910]
  2. Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Basic Research Cooperation Special Project [19JCZDJC65800 (Z)]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFA0105900]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the utilization, development, and cost of cathode materials in MFCs, highlighting effective modification methods that have led to improved power generation in recent years.
Since the high cost and low power generation hinder the overall practical application of microbial fuel cells (MFCs), numerous attempts have been made in the field of cathode materials to enhance the electrical performance of MFCs because they directly catalyze the oxygen reduction reactions (ORR). To choose a proper cathode material, following principles such as ORR activity, conductivity, cost efficiency, durability, surface area, and accessibility should be taken into consideration. In preparation of cathode materials, versatile materials have been chosen, synthesized, or modified to achieve an improvement in power generation of MFCs. The most widely applied cathode materials could be categorized into three classes, namely carbon-base materials, metal-based materials, and biocatalysts. This review summarizes the utilization, development, and the cost of cathode materials applied in MFCs and tries to highlight the effective modification methods of cathode materials which have helped in achieving enhanced power generation of MFCs in recent years. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available