4.5 Article

LASP-1 interacts with ErbB2 in ovarian cancer cells

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 479, Issue 1, Pages 23-38

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20210173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology
  2. Department of Science and Technology
  3. University Grants Commission
  4. Indian Council of Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between LASP-1 and ErbB2 may play an important role in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer, with their binding and phosphorylation being independent of the kinase activity of ErbB2.
LASP-1 was identified as a protein following mass spectrometric analysis of phosphoproteins consequent to signaling by ErbB2 in SKOV-3 cells. It has been previously identified as an oncogene and is located on chromosomal arm 17q 0.76 Mb centromeric to ErbB2. It is expressed in serous ovarian cancer cell lines as a 40 kDa protein. In SKOV-3 cells, it was phosphorylated and was inhibited by Lapatinib and CP7274714. LASP-1 co-immunoprecipitated with ErbB2 in SKOV-3 cells, suggesting a direct interaction. This interaction and phosphorylation were independent of the kinase activity of ErbB2. Moreover, the binding of LASP-1 to ErbB2 was independent of the tyrosine phosphorylation of LASP-1. LASP-1 was neither expressed on the surface epithelium of the normal ovary nor in the fallopian tube. It was expressed in 28% of ovarian tumours (n =101) that did not significantly correlate with other clinical factors. In tumours from patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast who had ErbB2 amplification (3+), LASP-1 was expressed in 3/20 (P < 0.001). Analysis of the expression of an independent dataset of ovarian and breast tumours from TCGA showed the significant co-occurrence of ErbB2 and LASP-1 (P < 0.01). These results suggest that LASP-1 and ErbB2 interaction could be important in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available