4.5 Article

High-speed C-H chlorination of ethylene carbonate using a new photoflow setup

Journal

BEILSTEIN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 152-158

Publisher

BEILSTEIN-INSTITUT
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.18.16

Keywords

C-H chlorination; chlorine gas; ethylene carbonate; photo flow reactor; vinylene carbonate

Funding

  1. Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science at NYCU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the high-speed C-H chlorination of ethylene carbonate and introduces a photoflow setup for gas-liquid biphasic reactions. The direct use of chlorine gas and the photoirradiation conditions affect the selectivity of the product.
We report the high-speed C-H chlorination of ethylene carbonate, which gives chloroethylene carbonate, a precursor to vinylene carbonate. A novel photoflow setup designed for a gas-liquid biphasic reaction turned out to be useful for the direct use of chlorine gas. The setup employed sloped channels so as to make the liquid phase thinner, ensuring a high surface-to-volume ratio. When ethylene carbonate was introduced to the reactor, the residence time was measured to be 15 or 30 s, depending on the slope of the reactor set at 15 or 5 degrees, respectively. Such short time of exposition sufficed the photo C-H chlorination. The partial irradiation of the flow channels also sufficed for the C-H chlorination, which is consistent with the requirement of photoirradiation for the purpose of radical initiation. Near-complete selectivity for single chlorination required the low conversion of ethylene carbonate such as 9%, which was controlled by limited introduction of chlorine gas. At a higher conversion of ethylene carbonate such as 61%, the selectivity for monochlorinated ethylene carbonate over dichlorinated ethylene carbonate was 86%. We found that the substrate contamination with water negatively influenced the performance of the C-H chlorination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available