4.6 Article

Resting-state functional connectivity relates to interindividual variations in positive memory

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 419, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113663

Keywords

Functional connectivity; Positive memory; Resting-state fMRI; Spatial pairwise clustering

Funding

  1. KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP20H05711]
  2. Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences (Integrated Research on Depression, Dementia and Development Disorders) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP20dm0107094]
  3. MEXT Quantum Leap Flagship Pro-gram (MEXT Q-LEAP) [JPMXS0120330644]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found a positive association between individual differences in positive memory recollection and functional connectivity in the brain at rest. The frontotemporal network connectivity may have implications for vulnerability to stress and depression.
Individual differences in positive memory recollection are of interest in mental health, as positive memories can help protect people against stress and depression. However, it is unclear how individual differences in positive memory recollection are reflected in brain activity in the resting state. Here, we investigate the resting-state functional connectivity (FC) associated with interindividual variations in positive memory by employing cluster-level inferences based on randomization/permutation region of interest (ROI)-to-ROI analyses. We identified a cluster of FCs that was positively associated with positive memory performance, including the frontal operculum, central operculum, parietal operculum, Heschl's gyrus, and planum temporale. The current results suggest that positive memory is innervated by frontotemporal network connectivity, which may have implications for future investigations of vulnerability to stress and depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available