4.8 Article

Lysosomal targetomics of ghr KO mice shows chaperone-mediated autophagy degrades nucleocytosolic acetyl-coA enzymes

Journal

AUTOPHAGY
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 1551-1571

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1990670

Keywords

Aging; autophagy; growth hormone; metabolism; proteomics

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH
  2. University of Washington Nathan Shock Center
  3. Paul F.Glenn Foundation for Medical Research
  4. SJE
  5. ACM
  6. EIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mice deficient in growth hormone receptor exhibit a dramatic lifespan extension and elevated hepatic chaperone-mediated autophagy. The increased CMA in these mice downregulates proteins involved in ribosomal structure, translation, and acetyl-CoA production, which in turn affects lipid droplet accumulation.
Mice deficient in GHR (growth hormone receptor; ghr KO) have a dramatic lifespan extension and elevated levels of hepatic chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). Using quantitative proteomics to identify protein changes in purified liver lysosomes and whole liver lysates, we provide evidence that elevated CMA in ghr KO mice downregulates proteins involved in ribosomal structure, translation initiation and elongation, and nucleocytosolic acetyl-coA production. Following up on these initial proteomics findings, we used a cell culture approach to show that CMA is necessary and sufficient to regulate the abundance of ACLY and ACSS2, the two enzymes that produce nucleocytosolic (but not mitochondrial) acetyl-coA. Inhibition of CMA in NIH3T3 cells has been shown to lead to aberrant accumulation of lipid droplets. We show that this lipid droplet phenotype is rescued by knocking down ACLY or ACSS2, suggesting that CMA regulates lipid droplet formation by controlling ACLY and ACSS2. This evidence leads to a model of how constitutive activation of CMA can shape specific metabolic pathways in long-lived endocrine mutant mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available