4.5 Article

Expert Intervention Learning An online framework for robot learning from explicit and implicit human feedback

Journal

AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 99-113

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-021-10006-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DARPA Dispersed Computing program, NIH R01 [R01EB019335]
  2. NSF CPS [1544797]
  3. NSF NRI [1637748]
  4. Office of Naval Research
  5. Honda Research Institute USA
  6. RCTA
  7. Amazon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces the Expert Intervention Learning (EIL) method, which learns collision avoidance for robots in real and simulated driving tasks through expert interventions. The approach can learn from just a few hundred samples (about one minute) of expert control.
Scalable robot learning from human-robot interaction is critical if robots are to solve a multitude of tasks in the real world. Current approaches to imitation learning suffer from one of two drawbacks. On the one hand, they rely solely on off-policy human demonstration, which in some cases leads to a mismatch in train-test distribution. On the other, they burden the human to label every state the learner visits, rendering it impractical in many applications. We argue that learning interactively from expert interventions enjoys the best of both worlds. Our key insight is that any amount of expert feedback, whether by intervention or non-intervention, provides information about the quality of the current state, the quality of the action, or both. We formalize this as a constraint on the learner's value function, which we can efficiently learn using no regret, online learning techniques. We call our approach Expert Intervention Learning (EIL), and evaluate it on a real and simulated driving task with a human expert, where it learns collision avoidance from scratch with just a few hundred samples (about one minute) of expert control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available