4.2 Article

Modal-based attention modulates attentional blink

Journal

ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 372-382

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02413-y

Keywords

Attentional blink; Selective attention; Bimodal-divided attention

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871092, 31700939, 31600882]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170333]
  3. Ministry of Education Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [17YJC190024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the impact of auditory-driven visual target perceptual enhancement on attentional blink (AB) using the RSVP paradigm. The results showed that cross-modal attentional enhancement was not influenced by stimulus salience, and stronger attentional enhancement in the bimodal condition led to the disappearance of AB.
In the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm, response accuracy for the target decreases when it appears within a short time window (200 similar to 500 ms) after the previous target. This phenomenon is termed the attentional blink (AB). Although mechanisms of cross-modal processing that reduce the AB have been documented, researchers have not explored the differences across modal attentional conditions. In the present study, we used the RSVP paradigm to investigate the effect of auditory-driven visual target perceptual enhancement on the AB under modality-specific selective attention (Experiment 1) and bimodal-divided attention (Experiment 2). The results showed that cross-modal attentional enhancement was not moderated by stimulus salience. Moreover, the results also showed that accuracy was higher when the attended sound appeared simultaneously with the target. These results indicated that audiovisual enhancement reduced AB and that stronger attentional enhancement in the bimodal-divided attentional condition led to the disappearance of AB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available