4.6 Article

Evidence for Plasma Heating at Thin Current Sheets in the Solar Wind

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 924, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac4701

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund of Macao SAR [0002/2019/A1]
  2. Macau Foundation
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [42122061]
  4. preresearch project on Civil Aerospace Technologies - China National Space Administration [D020308, D020104]
  5. Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR [0002/2019/APD]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42074195, 42174199]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines plasma heating at thin current sheets in the solar wind using data from the WIND spacecraft from 2004 to 2019. The results show significant plasma heating at current sheets in both slow and fast wind, with a more significant increase in proton temperature in the fast wind.
Plasma heating at thin current sheets in the solar wind is examined using magnetic field and plasma data obtained by the WIND spacecraft in the past 17 years from 2004 to 2019. In this study, a thin current sheet is defined by an abrupt rotation (larger than 45 degrees) of the magnetic field direction in 3 s. A total of 57,814 current sheets have been identified, among which 25,018 current sheets are located in the slow wind and 19,842 current sheets are located in the fast wind. Significant plasma heating is found at current sheets in both slow and fast wind. Proton temperature increases more significantly at current sheets in the fast wind than in the slow wind, while the enhancement in electron temperature is less remarkable at current sheets in the fast wind. The results reveal that plasma heating commonly exists at thin current sheets in the solar wind regardless of the wind speed, but the underlying heating mechanisms might be different.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available