4.7 Article

Physical Drivers of Emission-line Diversity of SDSS Seyfert 2s and LINERs after Removal of Contributions from Star Formation

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 922, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1e8d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Indiana Space grant Consortium
  2. NASA [NNX12AE06G, 80NSSc20K0440]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  5. University of Arizona
  6. Brazilian Participation Group
  7. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  8. Carnegie Mellon University
  9. French Participation Group
  10. German Participation Group
  11. Harvard University
  12. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  13. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  14. Johns Hopkins University
  15. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  16. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  17. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  18. Pennsylvania State University
  19. Princeton University
  20. Spanish Participation Group
  21. Yale University
  22. University of Florida
  23. University of Utah
  24. Vanderbilt University
  25. University of Virginia
  26. University of Washington
  27. New Mexico State University
  28. New York University
  29. University of Portsmouth
  30. University of Tokyo
  31. NASA [53386, NNX12AE06G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that mixing is not the principal cause of the extended morphology of the observed branch, but rather Seyferts/LINERs intrinsically have a wide range of line ratios. Variations in ionization parameter and metallicity can explain much of the diversity of Seyfert/LINER line ratios.
Ionization sources other than H ii regions give rise to the right-hand branch in the standard ([N ii]) BPT diagram, populated by Seyfert 2s and LINERs. However, because the majority of Seyfert/LINER hosts are star-forming (SF), H ii regions contaminate the observed lines to some extent, making it unclear if the position along the branch is merely due to various degrees of mixing between pure Seyferts/LINERs and SF, or whether it reflects the intrinsic diversity of Seyfert/LINER ionizing sources. In this study, we empirically remove SF contributions in similar to 100,000 Seyferts/LINERs from SDSS using the doppelganger method. We find that mixing is not the principal cause of the extended morphology of the observed branch. Rather, Seyferts/LINERs intrinsically have a wide range of line ratios. Variations in ionization parameter and metallicity can account for much of the diversity of Seyfert/LINER line ratios, but the hardness of the ionization field also varies significantly. Furthermore, our k-means classification on seven decontaminated emission lines reveals that LINERs are made up of two populations, which we call soft and hard LINERs. The Seyfert 2s differ from both types of LINERs primarily by higher ionization parameter, whereas the two LINER types mainly differ from each other (and from star-forming regions) in the hardness of the radiation field. We confirm that the [N ii] BPT diagram more efficiently identifies LINERs than [S ii] and [O i] diagnostics, because in the latter many LINERs, especially soft ones, occupy the same location as pure starformers, even after the SF has been removed from LINER emission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available