4.7 Article

Evidence of X-Ray Plateaus Driven by the Magnetar Spindown Winds in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 922, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2c74

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1938116, 11822304, 12173031, 12103047]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0402602]
  3. National SKA Program of China [2020SKA0120100]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province of China [212300410290]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019TQ0288]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the possibility of magnetars as the central engines of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). By analyzing data from the Neil Gehrels Swift GRB, three GRBs with features indicating magnetars as central engines were identified. Magnetars may play a significant role in GRBs, and future multimessenger observations could further validate this hypothesis.
The central engine of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) remains an open and cutting-edge topic in the era of multimessenger astrophysics. X-ray plateaus appear in some GRB afterglows, which are widely considered to originate from the spindown of magnetars. According to the stable magnetar scenario of GRBs, an X-ray plateau and a decay phase similar to t(-2) should appear in X-ray afterglows. Meanwhile, the normal X-ray afterglow is produced by the external shock from a GRB fireball. We analyze the Neil Gehrels Swift GRB data, then find three gold samples that have an X-ray plateau and a decay phase similar to t(-2) superimposed on the jet-driven normal component. Based on these features of the lightcurves, we argue that the magnetars should be the central engines of these three GRBs. Future joint multimessenger observations might further test this possibility, which can then be beneficial to constrain GRB physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available