4.7 Article

An Accreting Stellar Binary Model for Active Periodic Fast Radio Bursts

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 922, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac30db

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11833003]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021TQ0325]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0402600]
  5. National SKA Program of China [2020SKA0120300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a new model is proposed to explain fast radio bursts, where active periodic bursts are produced through accretion in a stellar binary system, along with various phenomena and mechanisms.
In this work, we propose an accreting stellar binary model for understanding the active periodic fast radio bursts (FRBs). The system consists of a stellar compact object (CO) and a donor star (DS) companion in an eccentric orbit, where the DS fills its own Roche lobe near the periastron. The CO accretes the material from the DS and then drives relativistic magnetic blobs. The interaction between the magnetic blobs and the stellar wind of the DS produces a pair of shocks. We find that both the reverse shock and the forward shock are likely to produce FRBs via the synchrotron maser mechanism. We show that this system can in principle sufficiently produce highly active FRBs with a long lifetime, and also can naturally explain the periodicity and the duty cycle of the activity that appeared in FRBs 180916 and 121102. The radio nebula excited by the long-term injection of magnetic blobs into the surrounding environment may account for the associated persistent radio source. In addiction, we discuss the possible multiwavelength counterparts of FRB 180916 in the context of this model. Finally, we encourage the search for FRBs in ultraluminous X-ray sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available