4.6 Article

Multiplicity of Galactic luminous blue variable stars

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 657, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040062

Keywords

stars: variables: S Doradus; stars: evolution; binaries: general; stars: massive

Funding

  1. European Space Agency (ESA)
  2. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO)
  3. FWO_Odysseus program [G0F8H6N]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [772225: MULTIPLES]
  5. research council of the KU Leuven [C14/17/082]
  6. FWO [1281121N]
  7. European Union Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (20142020) under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [823734]
  8. South African Claude Leon Foundation
  9. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)
  10. Royal Observatory of Belgium
  11. Observatoire de Geneve
  12. Thuringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg
  13. university of Hamburg
  14. university of Guanajuato
  15. university of Liege
  16. Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) [2019-1-SCI-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the binary fraction and properties of Luminous blue variables (LBVs) in the Milky Way. Through spectroscopy and interferometry, a large binary fraction is detected, and possible formation mechanisms are proposed based on the analysis results.
Context. Luminous blue variables (LBVs) are characterised by strong photometric and spectroscopic variability. They are thought to be in a transitory phase between O-type stars on the main sequence and the Wolf-Rayet stage. Recent studies also evoked the possibility that they might be formed through binary interaction. Only a few are known in binary systems so far, but their multiplicity fraction is still uncertain. Aims. We derive the binary fraction of the Galactic LBV population. We combine multi-epoch spectroscopy and long-baseline interferometry to probe separations from 0.1 to 120 mas around confirmed and candidate LBVs. Methods. We used a cross-correlation technique to measure the radial velocities of these objects. We identified spectroscopic binaries through significant radial velocity variability with an amplitude larger than 35 km s(-1). We also investigated the observational biases to take them into account when we established the intrinsic binary fraction. We used candid to detect interferometric companions, derive their flux fractions, and their positions on the sky. Results. From the multi-epoch spectroscopy, we derive an observed spectroscopic binary fraction of 26(-10)(+16) %. Considering period and mass ratio ranges from log(P-orb) = 0 3 (i.e. from 1 to 1000 days), q = 0:1 1:0, and a representative set of orbital parameter distributions, we find a bias-corrected binary fraction of 62(24)(+38)%. Based on data of the interferometric campaign, we detect a binary fraction of 70 +/- 9% at projected separations between 1 and 120 mas. Based on the derived primary diameters and considering the distances of these objects, we measure for the first time the exact radii of Galactic LBVs to be between 100 and 650 R-circle dot. This means that it is unlikely that short-period systems are included among LBV-like stars. Conclusions. This analysis shows for the first time that the binary fraction in the Galactic LBV population is large. If they form through single-star evolution, their orbit must be large initially. If they form through a binary channel, the implication is that either massive stars in short binary systems must undergo a phase of fully non-conservative mass transfer to be able to sufficiently widen the orbit to form an LBV, or that LBVs form through merging in initially binary or triple systems. Interferometric follow-up would provide the distributions of orbital parameters at more advanced stages and would serve to quantitatively test the binary evolution in massive stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available