4.0 Article

Initial energy of a spatially flat universe: A hint of its possible origin

Journal

ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN
Volume 343, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asna.20224010

Keywords

Big Bang; cosmological parameters; cosmology; early universe; cosmology; observations; cosmology; theory; gravitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This passage discusses the evidence for a Big Bang origin of the universe and the mystery surrounding its cause. It explores the refinement of the range of possible initial conditions based on current physical theories, focusing on the spatial flatness of the universe and its implications. The passage also raises questions about the quantum beginning and the existence of fluctuations with nonzero energy.
The evidence for a Big Bang origin of the universe is truly compelling, though its cause remains a complete mystery. As the cosmic spacetime is revealed to us with ever-improving detail, however, we are beginning to refine the range of its possible initial conditions-at least within the framework of current physical theories. The universe, it seems, is spatially flat, and here we discuss in clear, straightforward terms why this trait implies a cosmos with zero kinetic plus gravitational energy, though apparently not zero total energy. Such an outcome has far reaching consequences because of the possibility that the universe may have begun its existence as a quantum fluctuation. Was this from nothing, or perhaps a preexisting vacuum? A nonzero total energy would seemingly preclude the former scenario, but not necessarily the latter, though this would then raise the question of how a fluctuation with nonzero energy could have lived long enough, or classicalized, for us to see it 13.5 billion years later. The high-precision measurement of the universe's spatial curvature may thus constitute the first tangible piece of evidence impacting a possible quantum beginning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available