4.5 Review

Radiofrequency Ablation in Cooled Monopolar or Conventional Bipolar Modality Yields More Beneficial Short-Term Clinical Outcomes Versus Other Treatments for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.048

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802210, 81672219]
  2. Key Project of Sichuan Science & Technology Department [2018SZ0223, 2018SZ0250]
  3. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University [Z20191008, Z2018B20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy of various radiofrequency ablation treatments for knee osteoarthritis and determined the optimal modality and treatment guidance. The results showed that radiofrequency ablation is effective in improving knee pain and function, with cooled bipolar radiofrequency ablation being the most effective modality.
Purpose: To evaluate various radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and determine the best modality, target, number of electrodes, and image guidance for improving knee pain and function. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of RFA treatments for knee OA from inception up to September 30, 2021. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the mean difference (MD) and rank the comparative effectiveness of treatments. Results: A total of 21 eligible RCTs (from 2011 to 2021, involving 1,818 patients) with 8 RFA treatments, 6 intra-articular injections, NSAIDS, exercise, and placebo were assessed. Conventional bipolar genicular nerve RFA (GNRFA) had the greatest net benefit on the VAS at 6 months (MD, -5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.3 to -6.7; SUCRA, .98). And cooled monopolar GNRFA had the greatest net benefit on the WOMAC at 6 months (MD, -33; 95% CL -37 to -29; SUCRA, .99). In conventional and pulsed modalities, bipolar RFA was associated with a significant decrease in VAS and WOMAC than monopolar RFA. Combining pulsed infra-articular RFA and platelet-rich plasma injection had no additional positive effects on VAS or WOMAC at 3 months. Conclusions: RFA is effective in improving both knee pain and function in patients with OA, at least in the short term (6 months). Patients respond better to the cooled modality than the conventional and pulsed modalities. Bipolar is more effective than monopolar for improving pain and function in conventional and pulsed modalities. Fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance showed no differences in improving pain and function. The effectiveness of RFA in cooled modality using bipolar or in combination with various intra-articular injections remains to be compared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available