4.4 Article

Differing pan-coronavirus antiviral potency of boceprevir and GC376 in vitro despite discordant molecular docking predictions

Journal

ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 4, Pages 1125-1130

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-022-05369-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [91719300]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201903250082, 201808370170]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that GC376 is more effective in inhibiting both SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal coronaviruses compared to boceprevir. Therefore, GC376 should be further developed as a pan-coronavirus antiviral agent. The study also emphasizes caution in interpreting in vitro data for the development of antiviral therapies.
Given the structural similarities of the viral enzymes of different coronaviruses (CoVs), we investigated the potency of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents boceprevir and GC376 for counteracting seasonal coronavirus infections. In contrast to previous findings that both boceprevir and GC376 are potent inhibitors of the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2, we found that GC376 is much more effective than boceprevir in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 and three seasonal CoVs (NL63, 229E, and OC43) in cell culture models. However, these results are discordant with a molecular docking analysis that suggested comparable affinity of boceprevir and GC376 for the different Mpro enzymes of the four CoVs. Collectively, our results support future development of GC376 but not boceprevir (although it is an FDA-approved antiviral medication) as a pan-coronavirus antiviral agent. Furthermore, we caution against overinterpretation of in silico data when developing antiviral therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available