4.6 Article

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: A Randomized Controlled Study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages 2083-+

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.04.015

Keywords

Rehabilitation; Shockwave; Shock wave; Tendon; Trigger finger

Funding

  1. Wan Fang Hospital [108-wf-phd-02]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 109-2926-I-010-501, MOST 107-2314-B-010-015-MY3, MOST 109-2926-I-010-502, MOST 109-2321-B-010-005, MOST 108-2923-B-010-002-MY3, MOST 109-2823-8-010-003-CV, MOST 109-2622-B-010-006, MOST 109-2321-B-010-006]
  3. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University [107F-M01-0504]
  4. Aiming for the Top University Plan, a grant from Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the treatment of trigger finger (TF), wide-focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a safe and effective option for pain relief and functional improvement, with the high-energy ESWT group showing better treatment outcomes compared to the low-energy and sham groups.
Objectives: To determine the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and to determine the ideal energy flux density of wide focused ESWT in the treatment of trigger finger (TF). Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: A university hospital. Participants: A total of 60 patients (N=60) with grade II TF according to the Quinnell classification were randomly and evenly allocated to 3 treatment groups. Interventions: Three treatment groups included a high-energy ESWT (HS) group (energy flux density of 0.01 mJ/mm2, 5.8 bar, 1500 impulses, once per week for 4wk), a low-energy ESWT (LS) group (energy flux density of 0.006 mJ/mm2, 3 bar, 1500 impulses, once per week for 4wk), and a sham intervention group (sham group). All participants received 6 months of follow-up after intervention when only painkillers were allowed as concomitant treatment. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical outcomes were followed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after intervention, including pain score, frequency of triggering, severity of triggering, functional impact of triggering, and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (qDASH). Results: All groups showed significant improvements from baseline in all clinical parameters, except for functional impact of triggering, 6 months after the interventions. However, the HS group demonstrated a higher magnitude of improvement than the LS and sham groups. In addition, the HS group reported significantly lower pain (P=.01) and lower qDASH (P=.008) than the sham group 6 months after the interventions. No adverse effects were reported in the HS and LS groups within 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Wide-focused ESWT is a safe and effective but dose-dependent alternative facilitating pain relief and functional improvement in the treatment of grade II TF according to the Quinnell classification. (C) 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available