4.6 Article

Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 102, Issue 4, Pages 416-422

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9748

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health of the Spanish Government [PI11/00010]
  2. Health Authorities of the Government of Navarra (Spain) [20/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe influence of anastomotic leak on local recurrence and survival remains debated in rectal cancer. MethodsThis was a multicentre observational study using data from the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project database. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, tumour location, stage, use of defunctioning stoma, administration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, invasion of circumferential resection margin, quality of mesorectal excision and anastomotic leakage were recorded. Anastomotic leak was defined as an anastomotic event requiring surgical intervention or interventional radiology, including pelvic abscesses without radiological evidence of leakage and early rectovaginal fistulas. Variables associated with oncological outcome were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis. ResultsA total of 1181 consecutive patients were included. Rates of anastomotic leak and 30-day postoperative mortality were 94 and 24 per cent respectively. Data from 1153 patients were analysed after a median follow-up of 5 years. Cumulative rates of local recurrence, overall recurrence, overall survival and cancer-specific survival were 49, 194, 775 and 847 per cent respectively. In the multivariable regression analysis, anastomotic leakage was not associated with local recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 080, 95 per cent c.i. 028 to 226; P = 0669), overall recurrence (HR 114, 070 to 185; P = 0606), overall survival (HR 110, 073 to 165; P = 0648) or cancer-specific survival (HR 123, 075 to 202; P = 0421). ConclusionAnastomotic leak after low anterior resection did not affect oncological outcomes in these patients. No adverse effects on cancer parameters

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available