4.7 Review

A Comparative Review of XFEM, Mixed FEM and Phase-Field Models for Quasi-brittle Cracking

Journal

ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 1009-1083

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-021-09604-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Business via the ADaMANT (Computational Framework for Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Alloy) project (Proyectos de I + D (Excelencia) [DPI2017-85998-P]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, through the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in RD [CEX2018-000797-S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents a critical comparison between three different numerical approaches for computational modelling of quasi-brittle structural failure. The study analyzes the relative performance of XFEM, mixed strain/displacement FE, and phase-field models, assessing load capacity, force-displacement curves, crack paths, collapse mechanisms, cost-efficiency, and other key issues. Through an extensive evaluation against selected numerical benchmark problems, the advantages and difficulties of each approach in practical engineering applications are discussed.
In this work, a critical comparison between three different numerical approaches for the computational modelling of quasi-brittle structural failure is presented. Among the many finite element approaches devised to solve the problem, both using continuous and discontinuous methods, the present study examines the relative performance of the XFEM, the mixed strain/displacement FE and phase-field models. These numerical techniques are selected as the current representatives of embedded, smeared and regularized models for analyzing the phenomenon of fracture with different mathematical descriptions for the cracking induced discontinuities in the displacement and strain fields. The present investigation focusses on the main differences of the formulation of these models both at the continuum and discrete level and discusses the main assets and burdens that ensue in their practical application. The relative advantages and difficulties related to their use in the computation of localized structural failure in engineering practice are evaluated against a 10-point checklist that cover the main challenges met by these models. The paper includes an extensive comparison of selected numerical benchmark problems analyzed with the three examined methods. Relative performance is assessed in terms of load capacity, force-displacement curves, crack paths, collapse mechanisms, cost-efficiency and other key issues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available