4.7 Review

A Review of Available Theories and Methodologies for the Analysis of Nano Isotropic, Nano Functionally Graded, and CNT Reinforced Nanocomposite Structures

Journal

ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 2237-2270

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-021-09652-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Human Resource and Development, Government of India
  2. National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra, India [2K17/NITK/PHD/6170004]
  3. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [SERB/AE/2020316]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the research on vibration, static and buckling analysis of nano sandwich, nano FG, and carbon nanotube reinforced nanocomposite plates, beams, and shells, highlighting the theories and methodologies adopted. The discussion includes size-dependent and size-independent theories, as well as hygrothermal-based analysis of nanostructures, categorizing the review based on materials used and theory-based grouping of research. Critical discussions are conducted for each material type, with outlooks for future studies.
Nanocomposites are making way for potential application in various fields of engineering. The present article reviews the work carried out on vibration, static and buckling analysis of nano sandwich, nano functionally graded (FG), and carbon nanotube reinforced nanocomposite plates, beams, and shells. A review of available theories and methodologies adopted by various researchers is highlighted and presented in tabulated form. Size-dependent and size-independent theories are also discussed in detail. Present work also incorporates hygrothermal-based analysis of nanostructures. The review work is first categorized based on the material used (FG, CNTRC, etc.), and then in subsequent categorizations, the theory-based grouping of research is presented. Critical discussion is also carried out for each type of material, along with the scope of future study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available