4.5 Article

Use of threonine fermentation biomass as an alternative replacement of fishmeal in fish-free diets for Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles: The effects on growth performance and apparent digestibility

Journal

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
Volume 53, Issue 7, Pages 2970-2974

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.15785

Keywords

bacterial protein meal; in vivo digestibility; Proplex T; shrimp nutrition; sustainability

Categories

Funding

  1. Secretaria de Educacion Publica (SEP) [UABC-PTC-808]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the effect of threonine fermentation biomass (TFB) as an alternative protein source to replace fishmeal (FM) on shrimp growth and apparent digestibility. The results showed that replacing up to 12% of FM with TFB did not affect shrimp growth performance.
This present work aimed to evaluate the effect of threonine fermentation biomass (TFB) as an alternative protein source to replace the fishmeal (FM) in diets for Litopenaeus vannamei on shrimp growth and apparent digestibility. Four fish oil-free diets were formulated to contain 350 g kg(-1) of crude protein with different TFB levels in replacement of FM (g kg(-1)): (1) 0, control; (2) 35.9, low (L-TFB); (3) 71.8, medium (M-TFB); (4) 107.7, high (H-TBF). A 42-day feeding experiment was evaluated in triplicate with 60 juveniles (4.94 +/- 0.34 g) distributed aleatory into 12 20-L tanks and fed four times a day at 8% of the total biomass. Faeces were collected daily by siphon four times a day after the first week of the feeding experiment to determine the apparent dry matter and protein digestibility coefficients (ADMD and APD respectively) using acid insoluble ash as an internal marker. Growth performance was not affected, but higher ADMD and APD were recorded in the M-TFB. Thus, FM was replaced up to 12% with TFB, achieving the formulation of a fish-free diet with a proper balance between bacterial, animal and plant ingredients without compromising its digestibility and shrimp growth performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available