4.7 Article

Damage kinetics induced by swift heavy ion impacts onto films of different thicknesses

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 566, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150640

Keywords

Electronic excitation; Thin film; Surface damage; Swift heavy ion; Electron emission; Nanocluster emission

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation, The Russian Federation [20-72-00048]
  2. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, Czech Republic [LTT17015, EF16\_013/0001552]
  3. EU [CA17126]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [20-72-00048] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The response of CaF2 thin films to swift heavy ions irradiation was studied using Monte-Carlo code TREKIS and molecular dynamics simulations. Two main factors affecting the damage kinetics in ion tracks of films with different thickness were considered: electron emission and layer thickness. It was found that the damage modes varied depending on the layer thickness, with through holes formation in the thinnest layers, hillock formation in intermediate thicknesses, and nanocluster emission from thick layers.
Response of CaF2 thin films to swift heavy ions irradiation is studied with Monte-Carlo code TREKIS and molecular dynamics simulations. Two factors affecting the damage kinetics in ion tracks in films of different thickness are considered: electron emission and an effect of the layer thickness. It is shown that escape of electrons from the target surface is important in films thinner than 15 nm and can significantly reduce energy deposited into the lattice. Three different modes of damage realize depending on the layer thickness: a through hole forms in the thinnest layers despite energy loss via electron emission, semispherical and spherical hillocks form at intermediate thicknesses, emission of nanoclusters occurs from thick layers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available